The Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to life imprisonment after he was convicted on multiple terrorism-related charges brought by the Federal Government.
Delivering the judgment on Thursday, Justice James Omotosho found Kanu guilty on seven counts, including incitement, issuing unlawful “sit-at-home” orders, promoting terrorist activities, and disseminating instructions linked to bomb-making and violent attacks across Nigeria’s southeast.
Judge Rejects Death Penalty, Cites International Concerns
The prosecution had urged the court to impose the death penalty, arguing that Kanu’s broadcasts and directives resulted in killings, destruction of public infrastructure, and widespread fear. Justice Omotosho, however, declined, citing “global concerns over capital punishment” while emphasizing that Kanu’s actions exhibited a “demonstrated tendency for violence.”
“While the law permits the death penalty, the sanctity of life compels this court to exercise restraint,” the judge said.
Kanu received life imprisonment for four counts, 20 years for one count, and five years for another. All sentences are to run concurrently, meaning he will effectively serve a life term.
The court also ruled that Kanu should be held in a high-risk correctional facility and barred him from possessing or using digital devices, citing fears he could continue to influence followers from custody.
Government, Lawmakers React
Following the ruling, reactions poured in from government circles and lawmakers.
A senior official involved in the prosecution described the judgment as “a victory for national security,” saying it sends a clear message that “violent extremism will not be tolerated.”
However, Hon. Obi Aguocha, a member of the House of Representatives who appeared in court, appealed for leniency before sentencing and warned that the outcome could have far-reaching implications.
“We must consider justice with mercy,” Aguocha pleaded, urging the court to weigh national unity alongside legal punishment.
IPOB Supporters Voice Mixed Emotions
In parts of the southeast, where IPOB enjoys significant support, reactions were mixed. Some residents described the decision as “provocative,” warning of possible tensions. Others argued the verdict could help restore normalcy after years of intermittent violence and lockdowns.
Security agencies are reportedly monitoring key states, anticipating possible protests.
Legal Team to Appeal
Kanu’s lawyers condemned the ruling as “deeply flawed” and announced plans to file an appeal at the Court of Appeal, insisting their client’s arrest and extradition were unlawful and should invalidate the trial.
Background
Nnamdi Kanu has been the central figure in renewed Biafra separatist agitation. Since founding IPOB, he has driven a campaign calling for a referendum on independence for the old Eastern Region. The Federal Government designated IPOB a terrorist organization in 2017, a label the group strongly rejects.
His arrest, escape from Nigeria, and eventual re-arrest sparked years of legal battles, political divisions, and security challenges in the southeast.
What This Verdict Means
The life sentence marks one of Nigeria’s most consequential terrorism judgments in recent years. It brings closure to a case that has dominated national discourse but may open a new chapter of political and security tension.